<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mySociety &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysociety.org/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysociety.org</link>
	<description>Relentless user-focus on civic websites</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>TheyWorkForYou Redesign</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/07/03/theyworkforyou-redesign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/07/03/theyworkforyou-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TheyWorkForYou]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Richard Pope has been redesigning mySociety&#8217;s biggest site TheyWorkForYou.com for a couple of months.
He&#8217;s done a heroic job, as has Matthew with his epic import of Hansard data from 1935 onwards.  TheyWorkForYou is a much better site for their combined work recently. We&#8217;ll be writing more on the historic stuff soon.
There are a few things [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mysociety.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/twfy.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1265" title="twfy" src="http://www.mysociety.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/twfy.png" alt="" width="500" height="299" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://memespring.co.uk">Richard Pope</a> has been redesigning mySociety&#8217;s biggest site <a href="http://theyworkforyou.com/" target="_blank">TheyWorkForYou.com</a> for a couple of months.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s done a heroic job, as has <a href="http://dracos.co.uk">Matthew</a> with his epic import of Hansard data from 1935 onwards.  TheyWorkForYou is a much better site for their combined work recently. We&#8217;ll be writing more on the historic stuff soon.</p>
<p>There are a few things I&#8217;d like from you as a member of the mySociety community:</p>
<p>1. Please say a big thanks to Richard. This was not an easy or relaxing task at all, and he&#8217;s done it brilliantly. Just check a <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2009-07-01a.225.6&amp;s=speaker%3A13178#g234.0">Lords debate</a> to see the attention to detail. We are a very lucky organisation to have him, as he&#8217;s always in demand.</p>
<p>2. Please <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/about/contact/">give some constructive criticism</a> on how it could be even better (please note, focussing on design here, we already have a load of feature priorities to deliver).</p>
<p>3. Anyone who could help supply a redesigned logo, or some nicely processed parliamentary-themed artwork to sit in the background grey-boxes on the homepage would be doing a very Good Deed for mySociety.</p>
<p>And lastly, <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com/twfypatrons">please do pledge to become a TheyWorkForYou Patron</a>, so we can keep doing things like this in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/07/03/theyworkforyou-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speaker Election Day: Who&#8217;s in and who&#8217;s out</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/06/22/speaker-election-day-whos-in-and-whos-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/06/22/speaker-election-day-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the decisive voting day dawns, mySociety has eight full or partial endorsements of our 3 Principles from possible candidates for Speaker of the Commons. We hope you take a look at what they said in full on their TheyWorkForYou pages. Just five possible candidates didn&#8217;t reply in writing, or at all - those absentees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the decisive voting day dawns, mySociety has <strong>eight </strong><strong>full or partial endorsements of our </strong><strong><a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/05/21/3-principles-we-are-asking-speaker-candidates-to-endorse-you-can-help-right-now/">3 Principles</a></strong> from possible candidates for Speaker of the Commons<strong>.</strong> We hope you take a look <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/06/10/speaker-candidates-half-the-field-now-endorses-mysocietys-principles/">at what they said in full</a> on their TheyWorkForYou pages. Just five possible candidates didn&#8217;t reply in writing, or at all - those absentees being Patrick Cormack, Sylvia Heal, Margaret Beckett, Parmijit Dhanda and Ann Widdecombe (who did phone, but doesn&#8217;t seem to have followed up with email). Interestingly, the five non-respondants included both candidates whose offices don&#8217;t accept email (Beckett and Cormack).</p>
<p>The last time MPs voted for a speaker, the one candidate who didn&#8217;t show at the hustings went on to win. Let&#8217;s hope MPs learned the lesson of voting for a candidate who isn&#8217;t willing to stand up and be counted when it comes to the issues that make their job so critical&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/06/22/speaker-election-day-whos-in-and-whos-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Say hello to Mapumental</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/06/01/say-hello-to-mapumental/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/06/01/say-hello-to-mapumental/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Launches]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel Time Maps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We&#8217;ve been hinting for a while about a secret project that we&#8217;re working on, and today I&#8217;m pleased to be able to take the wraps off Mapumental. It&#8217;s currently in Private Beta but invites are starting to flow out.
Built with support from Channel 4&#8217;s 4IP programme, Mapumental is the culmination of an ambition mySociety has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="380"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vVZkHuomqfM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vVZkHuomqfM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="380"></embed></object></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been hinting for a while about a secret project that we&#8217;re working on, and today I&#8217;m pleased to be able to take the wraps off <a href="http://mapumental.channel4.com">Mapumental</a>. It&#8217;s currently in Private Beta but invites are starting to flow out.</p>
<p>Built with support from <a href="http://www.4ip.org.uk/">Channel 4&#8217;s 4IP</a> programme, Mapumental is the culmination of an ambition mySociety has had for some time - to take the nation&#8217;s bus, train, tram, tube and boat timetables and turn them into a service that does vastly more than imagined by traditional journey planners.</p>
<p>In its first iteration it&#8217;s specially tuned to help you work out where else you might live if you want an easy commute to work. </p>
<p><a href="http://flourish.org">Francis Irving</a>, the genius who made it all work, will post on the immense technical challenge overcome, soon. My thanks go massively to him; to <a href="http://stamen.com">Stamen</a>, for their lovely UI, and to <a href="http://dracos.co.uk">Matthew</a>, for being brilliant as always.</p>
<p><b>Words don&#8217;t really do Mapumental justice, so please just watch the video :) Update: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVZkHuomqfM">Now available here in HD too</a></b></p>
<p>Also new: <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com/twfypatrons">We&#8217;ve just set up a TheyWorkForYou Patrons pledge</a> to help support the growth and improvement of that site. I can neither confirm nor deny that pledgees might get invites more quickly than otherwise ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/06/01/say-hello-to-mapumental/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Principles we are asking Speaker candidates to endorse: You can help right now</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/05/21/3-principles-we-are-asking-speaker-candidates-to-endorse-you-can-help-right-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/05/21/3-principles-we-are-asking-speaker-candidates-to-endorse-you-can-help-right-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Appeals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Free Data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TheyWorkForYou]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Speaker&#8217;s Chair (Parliamentary Copyright)


mySociety has today emailed (and in one case, posted) a set of 3 Principles which we believe it is important that all candidates for Speaker endorse, before the election of a new Speaker by MPs.
1. Voters have the right to know in detail about the money that is spent to support MPs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h6 class="mceTemp">
<dl class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 488px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2116/2700549749_870d4aeed3.jpg?v=0"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2116/2700549749_870d4aeed3.jpg?v=0" alt="Speakers Chair (Parliamentary Copyright)" width="478" height="680" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Speaker&#8217;s Chair (Parliamentary Copyright)</dd>
</dl>
</h6>
<p>mySociety has today emailed (and in one case, <a href="http://www.epolitix.com/mpwebsites/mpwebsitepage/mpsite/sir-patrick-cormack-fsa/mppage/contacts-44/">posted</a>) a set of 3 Principles which we believe it is important that all candidates for Speaker endorse, before the election of a new Speaker by MPs.</p>
<h4 style="padding-left: 30px;">1. Voters have the right to know in detail about the money that is spent to support MPs and run Parliament, and in similar detail how the decisions to spend that money are settled upon.</p>
<p>2. Bills being considered must be published online in a much better way than they are now, as the Free Our Bills campaign has been <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/freeourbills">suggesting for some time</a>.</p>
<p>3. The Internet is not a threat to a renewal in our democracy, it is one of its best hopes. Parliament should appoint a senior officer with direct working experience of the power of the Internet who reports directly to the Speaker, and who will help Parliament adapt to a new era of transparency and effectiveness.</h4>
<p>We will be posting the status of requests on the <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/menzies_campbell/fife_north_east">likely</a> <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/chris_mullin/sunderland_south">candidates</a> <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/alan_beith/berwick-upon-tweed">web</a> <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/alan_haselhurst/saffron_walden">pages</a> where we expect large numbers of people to see them before the vote in late June. We have also taken the unusual step of allowing possible candidates to leave a statement of up to 150 words on the principles.</p>
<p>(NB no candidates have actually declared at this stage, so we are starting with the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8057450.stm">BBC&#8217;s list</a> of possibles)</p>
<p><strong>Rationale</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/21/blimey-it-looks-like-the-internets-won/">mySociety helped lead the campaign</a> back in January to prevent the last ditch attempts to conceal MPs&#8217; expenses. We did so not because, like the newspapers, we wanted to revel in embarrassment and scandal, but because we believe that in the Internet age, the only way for our democracy and government to thrive is if they are open and connected to the net as the rest of us expect them to be. The dramatic events seen in Parliament in recent days vindicate the view that secrecy breeds poor policies and seeds untrustworthy behaviour in the weaker willed.</p>
<p>Furthermore, more than a simple attitude of openness is required of the new Speaker: the public needs a genuine will to push for technological reform using the power of the Internet that will take both open-mindedness and a willing to tread on toes, especially in some parts of the unelected establishment.</p>
<p>Case in point: Over the last two years we have been <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/freeourbills/">trying to persuade Parliament</a> to acknowledge that the way it publishes its Bills online is hopelessly inadequate for the Internet age. The campaign has faltered, despite multi partly endorsement from <a href="http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=36490">140 MPs</a> and a campaign membership of thousands. To see why, just take a look at this <a href="http://tinyurl.com/pllj6k">colourful and error-crammed internal email</a> that we uncovered using the Freedom of Information Act, published for the first time today.</p>
<p>The new Speaker will have a tough job on their hands to overcome resistance of this kind. The best thing we can do is help the new Speaker, whoever they are, assume their new job with a clear mandate from the public, as well as from members.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Act!</strong></span></p>
<p>That is why, as a final part of this call, we are asking you, our community, <a href="http://writetothem.com">to write to your MP today</a> to let them know that you expect them to vote for a candidate that has endorsed the principles above. Your voices to your own constituency MPs can resonate in a way that no blog post or newspaper article ever can. <a href="http://writetothem.com">Go to it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/05/21/3-principles-we-are-asking-speaker-candidates-to-endorse-you-can-help-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs expenses: The best example yet of why FOI is a good law</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/05/15/mps-expenses-the-best-example-yet-of-why-foi-is-a-good-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/05/15/mps-expenses-the-best-example-yet-of-why-foi-is-a-good-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have seen a few months ago that mySociety led the campaign to stop the Freedom of Information Act being changed to conceal MPs expenses. And we won, which was nice.
Given the wall-to-wall revelations about taxpayer funded moats and bathplugs, and the new wave of  resignations and repayments,  we want to exercise a little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have seen a few months ago that mySociety led the <a href="../../../../2009/01/17/6-days-to-stop-mps-concealing-their-expenses/" target="_blank">campaign to stop the Freedom of Information Act being changed</a> to conceal MPs expenses. And we won, which was nice.</p>
<p>Given the wall-to-wall revelations about taxpayer funded moats and bathplugs, and the new wave of  resignations and repayments,  we want to exercise a little accountability by reminding readers of the arguments that were used to conceal this information twice in the last two years. These helpful examples should assist mySociety&#8217;s friends in keeping an eye out for similar dubious logic in the future.</p>
<p>First, in 2007, a concealment bill was tabled by a <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/david_maclean/penrith_and_the_border">backbencher</a>, but which oddly made it all the way to the Lords before failing (it would normally have been struck down by the government). The argument used then was that private mail sent by constituents to MPs <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/pbc/2006-07/Freedom_of_Information_%28Amendment%29_Bill/01-0_2007-02-07a.2.6" target="_blank">would end up in the hands of unscrupulous characters</a>, even though there was already another law to prevent this, and even though hardly anyone appears to have complained to the Information Commissioner about what the proposing MP described as a &#8216;<a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/pbc/2006-07/Freedom_of_Information_%28Amendment%29_Bill/01-0_2007-02-07a.2.0?s=%22vexed+problem%22#g2.30" target="_blank">vexed problem</a>&#8216;.</p>
<p>Then, back in January this year, a different and bold explanation was given: <strong>none</strong>. Instead, a strange pretence was played out in Parliament, in which the fact that MPs were being given the opportunity to vote to overrule a court-mandated order to publish was simply not mentioned: <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2009-01-15d.345.0&amp;s=%22freedom+of+information%22+speaker%3A10260#g350.2" target="_blank">Watch the video</a> of the Leader explaining what&#8217;s going to be voted for - any idea why people might be laughing as she stands up? Can you spot where she explains why the court needs overruling? The only explanation I could find anywhere for this reversal of openness was an anonymous quote in the Guardian.</p>
<p>So <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8051091.stm">here we are</a> after both attempts to hide expenses were defeated, watching as the rules around expenses change substantially and as MPs reach deep into their own pockets: all things that would not have taken place if either of the above proposals had passed. Simply the fact that the rules are changing and that the leaders of parties are apologising must make it clear that the excuses and non-excuses given above were, even if unintentionally, blocking better government.</p>
<p>Despite the obvious pain for MPs this week, and the fact that the whole act is doubtless being cursed across Westminster, <strong>we must shout from the hilltops that this week is a great success for the Freedom of Information Act, and a clear justification for why it is worth having on our books.</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong> <strong>Bad policies that both wasted money and eroded public trust are being swept away, and it is entirely down to the  Act and its supporters</strong>. More Freedom of Information will mean more such improvements, and people of good will should support its defence and its extension.</p>
<p><strong>Note</strong>: When can the rest of us have the data, please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/05/15/mps-expenses-the-best-example-yet-of-why-foi-is-a-good-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mySociety launches ScenicOrNot</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/04/10/mysociety-launches-scenicornot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/04/10/mysociety-launches-scenicornot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Launches]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry Metcalfe and co have been working for us recently to build a new mini-site, ScenicOrNot.
The goal of ScenicOrNot is to be a gentle-ambling sort of quasi game that&#8217;s just compelling enough to keep clicking on, just in case the next picture is the dream valley in which you wish to be buried.
mySociety&#8217;s obviously not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 514px"><a href="http://scenic.mysociety.org/view-185760-Across-Loch-Ericht-to-Sron-a-Chlaonaidh"><img title="Across Loch Ericht to Sron a Chlaonaidh (by Geoff White on Geograph)" src="http://scenic.mysociety.org/data/img//01/01/55/1015544_302bed2a.jpg" alt="" width="504" height="377" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Score - 9.5: Across Loch Ericht to Sron a Chlaonaidh (by Geoff White on Geograph)</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.thedextrousweb.com/">Harry Metcalfe and co</a> have been working for us recently to build a new mini-site, <a href="http://scenic.mysociety.org">ScenicOrNot</a>.</p>
<p>The goal of ScenicOrNot is to be a gentle-ambling sort of quasi game that&#8217;s just compelling enough to keep clicking on, just in case the next picture is the dream valley in which you wish to be buried.</p>
<p>mySociety&#8217;s obviously not in the business of building games for their own sake, though. This is <a href="http://theyworkforyou.com/video">another </a>crowdsourcing experiment to solve a specific problem - we need a scenicness map of the UK for a major upcoming mySociety project, and there ain&#8217;t one to be had any other way, for love or money.</p>
<p>So if you like mySociety, or just want to ogle the best and worst of this Island, <a href="http://scenic.mysociety.org">please have a play</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/04/10/mysociety-launches-scenicornot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ada Lovelace Day: Angie Ahl</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-angie-ahl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-angie-ahl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most striking uses of PledgeBank in recent times was the pledge made by 1700 people to commemorate Ada Lovelace&#8217;s birthday by blogging about an inspiring woman in the technology world.
I have had several possible choices, but I&#8217;ve decided on Angie Ahl, mySociety&#8217;s 4th and most recent full time developer.
Angie is mySociety through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most striking uses of PledgeBank in recent times was the <a href="www.pledgebank.com/AdaLovelaceDay">pledge made by 1700 people</a> to commemorate Ada Lovelace&#8217;s birthday by blogging about an inspiring woman in the technology world.</p>
<p>I have had several possible choices, but I&#8217;ve decided on <a href="http://www.vertebrate.co.uk/about/who/angie.html">Angie Ahl</a>, mySociety&#8217;s 4th and most recent full time developer.</p>
<p>Angie is mySociety through and through. A born perl hacker, never happier than knee deep in some grungy regular expressions, she&#8217;s also gifted with an inate understanding of the possibilities of technology for democratic reform. At interview I asked her what change she&#8217;d like to see happen from the government side of our sector, and she replied that she thought the biggest possible win was to publish Bills in parliament in a proper format. You might have heard all this before, thanks to <a href="http://theyworkforyou.com/freeourbills">Free Our Bills</a>, but Angie was commenting several months before we ever discussed the idea for the campaign with anyone else. She&#8217;d just looked at the world and the obvious problem had jumped out, clear as day.</p>
<p>Sadly, it&#8217;s no secret than Angie&#8217;s been seriously ill for some time. Despite this she&#8217;s managed things that&#8217;d be beyond me in the best of health: I&#8217;m only typing into wordpress now because she migrated the whole of this site from our previous system.  She came to our retreat back in January and showed an unerring ability to ask tough questions of the right people, even when tired.  </p>
<p>Angie beat a 100% male field to get the job she has now.  She&#8217;s unpretentious, straight talking and as glowingly warm to be near as a roaring log fire.  She&#8217;s also getting married within the next few days. Congrats, Angie: Tommy couldn&#8217;t have done better.</p>
<p>AdaLovelaceDay09</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-angie-ahl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postcode and boundary refresh</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/02/04/postcode-and-boundary-refresh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/02/04/postcode-and-boundary-refresh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Somerville</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We updated our boundary and postcode database at the start of the week (apart from two wards in Scotland that I misspelled and updated on Tuesday, sorry), so hopefully everyone in the country can contact their representatives at WriteToThem or have their postcode recognised on HearFromYourMP or TheyWorkForYou. This applies especially to a small number [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We updated our boundary and postcode database at the start of the week (apart from two wards in Scotland that I misspelled and updated on Tuesday, sorry), so hopefully everyone in the country can contact their representatives at <a href="http://www.writetothem.com/">WriteToThem</a> or have their postcode recognised on <a href="http://www.hearfromyourmp.com/">HearFromYourMP</a> or <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/">TheyWorkForYou</a>. This applies especially to a small number of councils, such as Bradford, for which the boundaries had completely changed at their last election and which we were unable to get working until now - apologies for the inconvenience.</p>
<p>Related to this, and for interest, on 1st April, a number of councils are being abolished as their county councils become unitary authorities. The district councils within Durham, Northumberland, Cornwall, Wiltshire, Shropshire, and Cheshire/Chester all disappear - Cheshire becomes two unitary authorities called Cheshire West and Chester, and Cheshire East. Lastly, Bedford borough council becomes a unitary authority, and Central Bedfordshire council covers the area previously covered by Mid Bedfordshire and South Bedfordshire.</p>
<p>Parliamentary boundaries in England and Northern Ireland are changing, but these do <em>not take effect</em> until the next general election - until then, your constituency and MP remains the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/02/04/postcode-and-boundary-refresh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blimey. It looks like the Internets won</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/21/blimey-it-looks-like-the-internets-won/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/21/blimey-it-looks-like-the-internets-won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Successes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TheyWorkForYou]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: If you approve of what we did this week, and what to help make sure we can still do it in the future, please pledge to support us: http://www.pledgebank.com/supportmysociety
The vote on concealing MPs&#8217; expenses has been cancelled by the government! 
In other words - we won!
This is a huge victory not just for transparency, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: If you approve of what we did this week, and what to help make sure we can still do it in the future, please pledge to support us: <a href="http://www.pledgebank.com/supportmysociety">http://www.pledgebank.com/supportmysociety</a></p>
<p>The vote on concealing MPs&#8217; expenses has <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7842402.stm">been cancelled by the government! </a></p>
<p>In other words - we won!</p>
<p>This is a huge victory not just for transparency, it&#8217;s a bellwether for a change in the way politics works. There&#8217;s no such thing as a good day to bury bad news any more, the Internet has seen to that.</p>
<p>Over 7000 people joined a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50061011231">Facebook group</a>, they sent thousands of emails to over 90% of all MPs. Hundreds of thousands of people found out about the story by visiting <a href="http://theyworkforyou.com">TheyWorkForYou</a> to find something they wanted to know, reading an email alert, or simply discovered what was going on whilst checking their Facebook or Twitter pages. Almost all of this happened, from nowhere, within 48 hours, putting enough pressure on Parliament to force change.</p>
<p>Make no mistake. This is new, and it reflects the fact that the Internet generation expects information to be made available, and they expect to be able to make up their own minds, not be spoon fed the views of others. This campaign was always about more than receipts, it was about changing the direction of travel, away from secrecy and towards openness.</p>
<p>Today we stopped moving in the wrong direction. Tomorrow we start moving the right way. <strong>Sign up to our news mailing list</strong> (box on the right) to get updates on what mySociety gets up to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/21/blimey-it-looks-like-the-internets-won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday morning update</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/21/wednesday-morning-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/21/wednesday-morning-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Somerville</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Appeals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TheyWorkForYou]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=1091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7,000 members on the Facebook group, over 93% of MPs contacted. Lots of news coverage: BBC, Daily Mail, Guardian, Telegraph, Times. John Mann MP makes a good point in a letter to the Guardian: &#8220;Few of my constituents care about the detail of how I spend their money as long as I do a good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7,000 members on the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50061011231">Facebook group</a>, over 93% of MPs contacted. Lots of news coverage: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7841702.stm" title="Showdown looms over MPs' expenses">BBC</a>, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1124843/Brown-orders-MPs-to-expenses-secret.html">Daily Mail</a>, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jan/21/mps-expenses">Guardian</a>, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/4299501/Labour-MPs-will-be-forced-to-vote-in-favour-of-withholding-details-of-expenses.html">Telegraph</a>, <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5555040.ece">Times</a>. John Mann MP makes a good point in a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jan/21/mps-expenses-parliament">letter to the Guardian</a>: &#8220;Few of my constituents care about the detail of how I spend their money as long as I do a good job, but nearly all of them care that they have the right to find out if they really feel the need to.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tom has updated the <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/17/6-days-to-stop-mps-concealing-their-expenses/">main blog post</a> with a quote from President Obama&#8217;s speech that I thought was worth repeating, on why this is a much bigger issue than some bits of paper and some minor embarrassment: “And those of us who manage the public’s dollars will be held to account - to spend wisely, reform bad  habits, and do our business in the light of day - because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.”</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t already, do <a href="http://foiorder2009.writetothem.com/">write to your MP</a>, and pick up the phone and call your local radio and TV news stations to let them know about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/21/wednesday-morning-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
