<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political parties don&#8217;t know where the boundaries are</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/</link>
	<description>Usability with Purpose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:53:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1914</guid>
		<description>Ric: I&#039;m afraid not, as supplying a list of all postcodes would clearly break our licence under which we have access to a postcode database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ric: I&#8217;m afraid not, as supplying a list of all postcodes would clearly break our licence under which we have access to a postcode database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric Hardacre</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric Hardacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>We the unwashed masses are very eternally grateful that you&#039;ve put all the time and effort you have into compiling a correct and proper postcode-constituency lookup. Now can we have a simple denormalized CSV of all of them rather than having to go through the online api?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We the unwashed masses are very eternally grateful that you&#8217;ve put all the time and effort you have into compiling a correct and proper postcode-constituency lookup. Now can we have a simple denormalized CSV of all of them rather than having to go through the online api?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>Yes, I guessed that :) And as I said, I tried it and it appears to be working fine. What postcode did you try that makes you think it wasn&#039;t working or gave an incorrect result?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I guessed that <img src='http://www.mysociety.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And as I said, I tried it and it appears to be working fine. What postcode did you try that makes you think it wasn&#8217;t working or gave an incorrect result?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>I was trying this out
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/api/docs/getConstituency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was trying this out<br />
<a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/api/docs/getConstituency" rel="nofollow">http://www.theyworkforyou.com/api/docs/getConstituency</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>Could you possibly be more specific? I&#039;ve just tried it and it appears to be working fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you possibly be more specific? I&#8217;ve just tried it and it appears to be working fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>The API call (ie the future tag) doesn&#039;t seem to be working for future constituencies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The API call (ie the future tag) doesn&#8217;t seem to be working for future constituencies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dickson</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>The key line in your piece here, Matthew, is the final line: &#039;The lack of any official service also doesn&#039;t help.&#039; For something so fundamental as this, we shouldn&#039;t have to rely on a charity to provide it.

PS The situation of the LibDems&#039; site re Northern Ireland is made worse by the inclusion of &#039;N. Ireland&#039; in the page footer - an external link to their sister party, Alliance, but presented in exactly the same format as the Scottish and Welsh LibDems. As an Ulsterman, I&#039;m used to general ignorance of such matters. But who built the new LibDem site? Ah yes, a Belfast agency. ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key line in your piece here, Matthew, is the final line: &#8216;The lack of any official service also doesn&#8217;t help.&#8217; For something so fundamental as this, we shouldn&#8217;t have to rely on a charity to provide it.</p>
<p>PS The situation of the LibDems&#8217; site re Northern Ireland is made worse by the inclusion of &#8216;N. Ireland&#8217; in the page footer &#8211; an external link to their sister party, Alliance, but presented in exactly the same format as the Scottish and Welsh LibDems. As an Ulsterman, I&#8217;m used to general ignorance of such matters. But who built the new LibDem site? Ah yes, a Belfast agency. ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1907</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was thinking the same when I tested it out. I&#039;ll pass that on to our website folk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was thinking the same when I tested it out. I&#8217;ll pass that on to our website folk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Somerville</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Somerville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1906</guid>
		<description>I did assume it was just a bug :) Glad to hear it&#039;s fixed. I still think you could give a nicer message for a Northern Ireland postcode than &quot;Sorry, we couldn’t find a constituency matching your postcode&quot; - your map has the whole UK, and even has a hover/link on Northern Ireland that doesn&#039;t go anywhere. Simply saying you don&#039;t stand candidates in Northern Ireland would at least tell people who might not know that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did assume it was just a bug <img src='http://www.mysociety.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Glad to hear it&#8217;s fixed. I still think you could give a nicer message for a Northern Ireland postcode than &#8220;Sorry, we couldn’t find a constituency matching your postcode&#8221; &#8211; your map has the whole UK, and even has a hover/link on Northern Ireland that doesn&#8217;t go anywhere. Simply saying you don&#8217;t stand candidates in Northern Ireland would at least tell people who might not know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2010/01/04/constituency-boundary-confusions/#comment-1905</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=3268#comment-1905</guid>
		<description>Postcode searches are now restored on www.libdems.org.uk so you can see that we return your examples correctly for new constituencies. (The exception is the Belfast West postcode as we don&#039;t stand candidates in Northern Ireland.)

Very pleased to see that TWFY now offers new boundary lookup though (you may remember my request for it in the past). It&#039;s been frustrating not having a commercial source, let alone a free one. Good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Postcode searches are now restored on <a href="http://www.libdems.org.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.libdems.org.uk</a> so you can see that we return your examples correctly for new constituencies. (The exception is the Belfast West postcode as we don&#8217;t stand candidates in Northern Ireland.)</p>
<p>Very pleased to see that TWFY now offers new boundary lookup though (you may remember my request for it in the past). It&#8217;s been frustrating not having a commercial source, let alone a free one. Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
