<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lazyweb &#8211; decent one off faxing service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/</link>
	<description>Relentless user-focus on civic websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Бaндитoчкa</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-99562</link>
		<dc:creator>Бaндитoчкa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-99562</guid>
		<description>За статью большое спасибо, все по делу, достаточно много кто это использует</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>За статью большое спасибо, все по делу, достаточно много кто это использует</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insurance motor tesco car</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-53743</link>
		<dc:creator>insurance motor tesco car</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-53743</guid>
		<description>car tesco motor insurance &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mylot.com/Allen6151&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tesco insurance car motor&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>car tesco motor insurance <a href="http://www.mylot.com/Allen6151" rel="nofollow">tesco insurance car motor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: streamline fha refinance mortgage</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-53534</link>
		<dc:creator>streamline fha refinance mortgage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-53534</guid>
		<description>streamline without fha refinance &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mylot.com/Terry9371&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;refinance for streamline fha&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>streamline without fha refinance <a href="http://www.mylot.com/Terry9371" rel="nofollow">refinance for streamline fha</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Tagg</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-39712</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Tagg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-39712</guid>
		<description>I so thoroughly agree with Tom Steinberg. I sincerely believed that fax, a piece of medieval steam technology, would be obsolete by the mid 1990s, so I sold my 1980s fax machine in 1990 and have since dealt only with email attachments until I ran up against two big, supposedly &quot;go-ahead&quot; corporations (one cutting-edge software producer and another a domain name administrator). They both persisted in wasting forest and in offering the most specious arguments for insisting on receiving faxes. &quot;We must have your signature and a recent photo&quot;, they say. No big deal with email attachments, of course while fax signatures and photos are in crude, lo-res black and white. I point out that I can let them have a signature in blue, red or green and a colour photo, all as attachments and involving no paper and no extra phone costs. It&#039;s also a bit more difficult to forge than lo-res black and white! But still they witter inanely away about &quot;company security policy&quot; as if that were an explanation! Due to such corporate stupidity I have to go down the road to the dentist&#039;s surgery and use their fax. So I&#039;m gobsmacked that no-one&#039;s come up with a 50-cent or even a dollar per sheet online fax facility. I thankfully only run up against fax silliness about once a year but I reckon that Tom Steinberg and I are hardly the only individuals to be confronted by corporate fax inertia. We may not be a huge market but I think someone could make a bit of money by helping to put us out of our fax misery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I so thoroughly agree with Tom Steinberg. I sincerely believed that fax, a piece of medieval steam technology, would be obsolete by the mid 1990s, so I sold my 1980s fax machine in 1990 and have since dealt only with email attachments until I ran up against two big, supposedly &#8220;go-ahead&#8221; corporations (one cutting-edge software producer and another a domain name administrator). They both persisted in wasting forest and in offering the most specious arguments for insisting on receiving faxes. &#8220;We must have your signature and a recent photo&#8221;, they say. No big deal with email attachments, of course while fax signatures and photos are in crude, lo-res black and white. I point out that I can let them have a signature in blue, red or green and a colour photo, all as attachments and involving no paper and no extra phone costs. It&#8217;s also a bit more difficult to forge than lo-res black and white! But still they witter inanely away about &#8220;company security policy&#8221; as if that were an explanation! Due to such corporate stupidity I have to go down the road to the dentist&#8217;s surgery and use their fax. So I&#8217;m gobsmacked that no-one&#8217;s come up with a 50-cent or even a dollar per sheet online fax facility. I thankfully only run up against fax silliness about once a year but I reckon that Tom Steinberg and I are hardly the only individuals to be confronted by corporate fax inertia. We may not be a huge market but I think someone could make a bit of money by helping to put us out of our fax misery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Steinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-33956</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Steinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-33956</guid>
		<description>Gary - because developers, even lovely mySociety developers, cost a lot more than make it possibly to justify using their time to send a single fax!

Thanks to everyone else for the tips, I&#039;ll come back here next time and try one then.

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary &#8211; because developers, even lovely mySociety developers, cost a lot more than make it possibly to justify using their time to send a single fax!</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone else for the tips, I&#8217;ll come back here next time and try one then.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary F</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-33671</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-33671</guid>
		<description>Tom, doesn&#039;t one of your own websites send a fax to MPs from constituents who want to get in touch? Then why not use your own API to send your fax or build your own SendMyFax.com website using whatever you use at the moment for everyone else to use for a small fee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, doesn&#8217;t one of your own websites send a fax to MPs from constituents who want to get in touch? Then why not use your own API to send your fax or build your own SendMyFax.com website using whatever you use at the moment for everyone else to use for a small fee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Amos-Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-30720</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Amos-Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-30720</guid>
		<description>hm my comment got trashed?!

Anyway suggested faxtastic.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm my comment got trashed?!</p>
<p>Anyway suggested faxtastic.co.uk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsto</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-30685</link>
		<dc:creator>dsto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-30685</guid>
		<description>http://www.skax.net/ ? (Windows only, sadly)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.skax.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.skax.net/</a> ? (Windows only, sadly)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-30678</link>
		<dc:creator>duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-30678</guid>
		<description>Alan, email is certainly capable of &#039;supporting images&#039;, either as an attachment or in an HTML email.  I&#039;m sure I&#039;m just misunderstanding what you mean.

Tom, how does WriteToThem do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, email is certainly capable of &#8216;supporting images&#8217;, either as an attachment or in an HTML email.  I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m just misunderstanding what you mean.</p>
<p>Tom, how does WriteToThem do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/10/31/lazyweb-decent-one-off-faxing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-29758</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/?p=922#comment-29758</guid>
		<description>I remember when http://www.tpc.int/ suggested that it might be possible to send images, but couldn&#039;t work out how that was even possible, since email is incapable of supporting images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when <a href="http://www.tpc.int/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tpc.int/</a> suggested that it might be possible to send images, but couldn&#8217;t work out how that was even possible, since email is incapable of supporting images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

