<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: mySociety&#8217;s Freedom of Information site goes live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysociety.org/2008/02/22/mysocietys-freedom-of-information-site-goes-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/02/22/mysocietys-freedom-of-information-site-goes-live/</link>
	<description>Relentless user-focus on civic websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:56:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/02/22/mysocietys-freedom-of-information-site-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-1968</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2008/02/22/mysocietys-freedom-of-information-site-goes-live/#comment-1968</guid>
		<description>I used the FoI to try and force out a document claimed by the local authority to be an environmental survey report, supporting their claim to chop down a    row of trees.
Objections to the proposal had to be submitted within 3 weeks, so the Legal department claimed that they had 20 “working “days to provide documents under the FoI Act from the date of receiving the request and then added 4 days to the date that the request was submitted by e-mail.
The document was eventually received 8 days after the closure for objections and proved to be a series of pictures of pits dug around the tree roots with no environmental assessment of impacts.
A complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman was dismissed. Aren’t they all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the FoI to try and force out a document claimed by the local authority to be an environmental survey report, supporting their claim to chop down a    row of trees.<br />
Objections to the proposal had to be submitted within 3 weeks, so the Legal department claimed that they had 20 “working “days to provide documents under the FoI Act from the date of receiving the request and then added 4 days to the date that the request was submitted by e-mail.<br />
The document was eventually received 8 days after the closure for objections and proved to be a series of pictures of pits dug around the tree roots with no environmental assessment of impacts.<br />
A complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman was dismissed. Aren’t they all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair Mangham</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2008/02/22/mysocietys-freedom-of-information-site-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair Mangham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2008/02/22/mysocietys-freedom-of-information-site-goes-live/#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>I think it would help if you could point to some guidance on FOI/EIR from this site. There are issues around exemptions, time spent and associated cost ( to the person requesting the information) in having to retrieve information that certainly affect local government ( not sure about central) that it would be useful for people to be aware of when they are framing their requests. If you can&#039;t find an appropriate link you are welcome to point to ours http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/content/council-and-democracy/publications-and-finances/freedom-of-information-publication-scheme/how-to-make-a-freedom-of-information-request.en  or reuse the appropriate content from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would help if you could point to some guidance on FOI/EIR from this site. There are issues around exemptions, time spent and associated cost ( to the person requesting the information) in having to retrieve information that certainly affect local government ( not sure about central) that it would be useful for people to be aware of when they are framing their requests. If you can&#8217;t find an appropriate link you are welcome to point to ours <a href="http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/content/council-and-democracy/publications-and-finances/freedom-of-information-publication-scheme/how-to-make-a-freedom-of-information-request.en" rel="nofollow">http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/content/council-and-democracy/publications-and-finances/freedom-of-information-publication-scheme/how-to-make-a-freedom-of-information-request.en</a>  or reuse the appropriate content from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
