<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The mySociety Call for Proposals: The winner and runners up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/</link>
	<description>Usability with Purpose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:53:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Irving</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Irving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-689</guid>
		<description>For people reading this now, the site turned into http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For people reading this now, the site turned into <a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadda, (Uganda)</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>wadda, (Uganda)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Well, what can i say?, this is a great idea because some of us in developing countries feel if such developments were available and accessible, change in the structure of enterprise development would very much be important. information is key and interactive requests and replies are the only foundation for indiscriminatory platform. It encourages even the fearful fellows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what can i say?, this is a great idea because some of us in developing countries feel if such developments were available and accessible, change in the structure of enterprise development would very much be important. information is key and interactive requests and replies are the only foundation for indiscriminatory platform. It encourages even the fearful fellows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: link ekle</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>link ekle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>In the example above, the page header and intro text prints. I’m trying to suppress that as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the example above, the page header and intro text prints. I’m trying to suppress that as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-686</guid>
		<description>An interesting idea and line of discussion. I&#039;ve posted something about this today on our blog at http://impact.freethcartwright.com/2006/11/foia_request_re.html

If the proposals on fees go through (see bit in our blog posting) then this type of proposal could take on an even greater significance. A body of volunteer requesters as a way of getting round the aggregation of fees proposal could be a good supplement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting idea and line of discussion. I&#8217;ve posted something about this today on our blog at <a href="http://impact.freethcartwright.com/2006/11/foia_request_re.html" rel="nofollow">http://impact.freethcartwright.com/2006/11/foia_request_re.html</a></p>
<p>If the proposals on fees go through (see bit in our blog posting) then this type of proposal could take on an even greater significance. A body of volunteer requesters as a way of getting round the aggregation of fees proposal could be a good supplement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Neil

Section 8(1)(b) of the FoI Act requires a request for information to state &quot;the name of the applicant and an address for correspondence&quot;, so public authorities do not have to reply to anonymous requests.  However, it would be possible for a named person at mySociety to act as a requester on behalf of somebody who wishes to stay anonymous, as an email address complies with the requirements.  If mySociety decides to go down this road, it should note that section 14(2) of the Act provides that public authorites aren&#039;t obliged to comply with repeated requests from a particular person.

(Interestingly - at least to FoI lawyers - the Environmental Information Regs do not require a request to be accompanied by a name.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil</p>
<p>Section 8(1)(b) of the FoI Act requires a request for information to state &#8220;the name of the applicant and an address for correspondence&#8221;, so public authorities do not have to reply to anonymous requests.  However, it would be possible for a named person at mySociety to act as a requester on behalf of somebody who wishes to stay anonymous, as an email address complies with the requirements.  If mySociety decides to go down this road, it should note that section 14(2) of the Act provides that public authorites aren&#8217;t obliged to comply with repeated requests from a particular person.</p>
<p>(Interestingly &#8211; at least to FoI lawyers &#8211; the Environmental Information Regs do not require a request to be accompanied by a name.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Sutherland</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-684</guid>
		<description>The FoIFA idea offers the possibility of allowing users to submit requests without being identifiable to the receiving authority.  This could be a good thing if it encouraged those who fear consequences, such as staff of public authorities, to submit requests.  Or it might encourage irresponsible use of the Act.  What do others think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FoIFA idea offers the possibility of allowing users to submit requests without being identifiable to the receiving authority.  This could be a good thing if it encouraged those who fear consequences, such as staff of public authorities, to submit requests.  Or it might encourage irresponsible use of the Act.  What do others think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTR</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>MTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>A very good idea which has been mentioned by many, including me !

http://www.foia-uk.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good idea which has been mentioned by many, including me !</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foia-uk.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7" rel="nofollow">http://www.foia-uk.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Irving</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Irving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Nah Phil, I just copied the idea from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yrtk.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Heather Brooke&lt;/a&gt;.

In the year or two since she first mentioned it to me, I&#039;ve found I&#039;ve had to build &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flourish.org/foi/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my own little mini FOI archive&lt;/a&gt; just to manage requests that I make personally. This is very much an &quot;itch I&#039;d like to scratch&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah Phil, I just copied the idea from <a href="http://www.yrtk.org/" rel="nofollow">Heather Brooke</a>.</p>
<p>In the year or two since she first mentioned it to me, I&#8217;ve found I&#8217;ve had to build <a href="http://www.flourish.org/foi/" rel="nofollow">my own little mini FOI archive</a> just to manage requests that I make personally. This is very much an &#8220;itch I&#8217;d like to scratch&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf Kleef</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf Kleef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>Regarding the A to B travel: it might be worthwhile to look at the Rideshare backend offered by DataGroceries at http://www.datagroceries.com/general.cgi?tmpl=communities.tmpl#ridesharing

Makes it easy to offer rides to/from places, festivals, etcetera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the A to B travel: it might be worthwhile to look at the Rideshare backend offered by DataGroceries at <a href="http://www.datagroceries.com/general.cgi?tmpl=communities.tmpl#ridesharing" rel="nofollow">http://www.datagroceries.com/general.cgi?tmpl=communities.tmpl#ridesharing</a></p>
<p>Makes it easy to offer rides to/from places, festivals, etcetera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan</title>
		<link>http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-winner-and-runners-up/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>A word of warning:
Craig Murray has had difficulty with republishing information received via FOI requests. The documents in question are still Crown Copyright and he was threatened with being sued if he published them (despite their being available under the FOI act).
I&#039;m not sure how, or if this will affect the project. I hope it doesn&#039;t and all the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A word of warning:<br />
Craig Murray has had difficulty with republishing information received via FOI requests. The documents in question are still Crown Copyright and he was threatened with being sued if he published them (despite their being available under the FOI act).<br />
I&#8217;m not sure how, or if this will affect the project. I hope it doesn&#8217;t and all the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
