What NEED does this meet?
Joe needs an electric drill with a 2cm masonry bit. He needs it for 5 minutes. Under business as usual, he goes to the DIY shop, buys the equipment, uses it, then lets it languish in his shed for the next 20 years. MEANWHILE, on his street, Fred, Freda, Frederik, and Frederika had exactly the thing he needed languishing in their sheds. They would have been happy to lend their drills to Joe, IF THEY HAD HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO OFFER THEM, and IF JOE HAD BEEN ABLE TO SEEK THEM OUT. Furthermore, this lending of useful things among neighbours, if it could be promoted, WOULD ENHANCE COMMUNITY SPIRIT, helping people get to know each other.
It’s like ebay, but (a) without money; and (b) local.
It’s like freecycle, but (a) organized better, like ebay (searchable, etc); (b) allowing many sorts of exchange, not just giving things away.
What is the APPROACH?
The idea needs a cool name that, like “google” and “ebay”, will pass into common parlance. Something like “koodle”. .
Set it up with the same look and feel as e-bay, including user accounts, but with the added detail that every object has associated with it a “street”. Each person who registers can associate themselves with a bunch of streets that are their community. When you search for a wood saw, the default is that it searches only in your street. If the search is unsuccessful, you can choose to add “saw wanted in this neighbourhood” to the “things-wanted scrolling-list thingy” that people see on their home page. Such requests for things-wanted would die off the wanted list on a time-scale of a few days.
Every time you find something is available you use the secure koodle communication interface to contact the person offering the thing. It sends email to them, or texts their mobile phone, or whatever method they have agreed. Like a dating site. Then the two of you get the chance to have a mutually consenting koodle. The koodle itself is the legal responsibility of those people alone, just like a dating agency isn’t responsible for your safety on your date.
WHEN THE KOODLE IS CONSUMATED, THE PERSON WHO LENT THE THING GETS A KOODLE CREDIT IN THE REGISTER OF KOODLES. (Like the ebayer rating system.) Koodle credits would have no obvious value, but it would be cool to be the koodle king on your street. Borrowing stuff through koodle would not use up any koodle credit. If you turned out to be a useless koodler, though, the lender could leave negative vibes. How to stop someone with negative vibes from just opening another account? Aha! The trick is to associate every person with a STREET ADDRESS. If anyone has any suspicions about someone they have never met before, they can just ask them to prove their address. With everyone identified by a userID and a street address, creating multiple identities would be much harder.
We’d have to figure out a good protocol for meeting people for the first time to make sure you are not ripped off by burglars.
I don’t think security would be an issue, though. People could include photos of themselves standing in their street, accessible by public key. The fact that DJCM lives at number 19 is in the public domain already. A typical exchange would be “Hi Freda from number 93! I’m DJCM at number 19 (maybe you’ve seen me on my bike) - I see you have a saw; please could I borrow it?” Freda checks that DJCM has got a 300-heart koodle rating, uses the secret key that DJCM has sent with the request to access DJCM’s photograph, confirms that it is a familiar face, and agrees the deal. Once the two of them make personal acquaintance, they can inform koodle that they are willing to open their full repositories to each other. Y’see, koodle allows you not only to list “stuff for the whole world to know about, that you are happy to lend”, but also “stuff that is fairly valuable, and that you are happy to lend to people on your street whom you come to trust, but want to keep secret from the general public.”
What are the BENEFITS to people?
Saves money. Saves environment. Less driving to the shops. Less buying of junk. More re-use.
Enhances knowledge of people on your own street.
Uses the internet to enhance local communities.
Could be used to advertise village plays, street events, local sports clubs, too. An electronic street noticeboard.
What is the COMPETITION?
There is nothing like this.
Newsgroups like ucam.marketplace are the closest thing, but they haven’t penetrated into public consciousness. freecycle has no search interface and no database of “a thousand things I am happy to loan”.
What BUDGETS & LOGISTICS are required?
Just as easy as setting up e-bay. :-) Except easier because there is none of the legal business to do with buying, paying, promising, posting.
It could be paid for by google advertisements.
It could be paid for by all those millions of users, a few of whom press the “paypal” button.
There could be a culture of “click the paypal button whenever you have a successful koodle with a neighbour”.
I dunno what it costs, but it needs to be done, and it isn’t going to happen without a charitable kick-start.
David says:
I like it. I think it could have a wider focus that isn’t reliant on the material goods sharing aspect. It sounds like something that could succeed on other fronts as well. My memory fails me at this point, but I believe there are similar schemes that have to do with reducing the amout of redundant purchases, and with tool/bicycle/etc loan schemes.
Really, what you’re proposing is a way of using the web to develop some sort of trust network, and it seems like this idea covers the essentials. From that point it can extend to keeping an eye on the cat, or co-ordinating activities. What’s interesting about this - and potentially scary - is that it facilitates knowing more about one’s neighbours. In turn, it means working to maintain good relations, which extends the scope into the activities of Residents Associations and so on. So we go from a tool exchange resource to a neighbourhood management resource. Anything that facilitates the latter sounds like a good idea to me. e-Democracy and all that.
written on May 30th, 2006Andy says:
Similar to the Local Borrowing Scheme idea already submitted to this site.
Same problems too: how is borrowing controlled in terms of users keeping an item too long or never returning it?
written on May 31st, 2006David MacKay says:
I don’t see the problem — length of borrowing duration is nothing to do with us; it’s between the people making the exchange. Koodle would make it easier to lend stuff because it would create a handy electronic record of whom-you-lent-stuff-to, to remind you “where that saw went”.
written on May 31st, 2006Roger says:
It’s basically the same as a LETS scheme, except without the local currency. You need some sort of currency (even though it’s not real money) to keep everybody happy otherwise you’ll soon get resentment from some individuals who (justified or not) feel they’re giving out more than they get back.
written on June 13th, 2006Rayya says:
How is this different to Freecycle?
www.freecycle.org
written on August 1st, 2006David MacKay says:
It’s different from freecycle in a crucial way: in one word: DATABASE.
written on August 1st, 2006In more detail: if you’ve ever tried giving away stuff on freecycle, you’ll find that while some items are popular (so that you have to send tons of ’sorry, it’s taken’ messages),
other items are not so popular. The less popular items are still available, but will anyone ever see them or ask for them? Very unlikely, because Freecycle uses this stupid human-based system for recording that something has been taken. The giver sends a ‘taken’ email. And the only way to find out what is still available is to somehow sort through all the last 10000 offers and see which offers do _not_ have a matching ‘taken’ email. This is stupid, when it’s the sort of thing that can be automated by computer. So yes, Koodle would provide a function like freecycle, but it would do it right. Seekers can _search_ for things (which freecycle emails are hopeless for). Lenders and Donors can remove things when they are no longer available. All searches will return correct up-to-date answers. Plus Koodle will enable all sorts of things that freecycle doesn’t conventionally support.
Mark says:
while this seems a good idea at firt glance there are some major problems!
written on February 2nd, 20071)Some systems like this exist - but are full of taken items where the donor hasn’t bothered mark the item taken when the transaction is complete - so you end up
2) Because in freecycle all items are gifted there is no legal obligation on moderators. Swaps and loans involve the facilitator in much more legal obligation If you administer such a site you need to make sure you carry insurance to cover you should there be a claim against you.
this is one reason freecycle avoids loans and swapping
yonatan says:
hi! just came across this post - I already have a site a bit like what you describe above: www.traxtuff.com
we don’t have a credits system or anything of the sort - for now it’s just lending and borrowing between friends. (so it’s private, and you don’t have the problems related with lending to people you don’t know).
in the near future I hope to also enable lending/borrowing between strangers, and perhaps swapping etc.
also I’m about to add item categories and notifications in the next days, to let people know what’s available to lend and borrow - that’s one challenge we have: getting people to think about finding stuff in the site AFTER they joined…
there used to be another interesting site with pretty high aims called “borrowme”, but they seem a bit dead in the last year.
written on February 3rd, 2008I also like some of the other sites in this small arena:
neighborrow which has a cool concept,
and lendlist which I like for it’s simplicity.
still I think my site is the best ;)
check it out and spread the word.